I got a cold call from ‘Waveney’ yesterday, who provide my
driving instructor car insurance. At
least, that was where he said he was from.
Before he could say anything to me though, he attempted to ask me for
some ‘security’ questions. The problem
as I see it when these organisations do this to us is that we have absolutely
no idea who we are really speaking to do we?
HSBC did it to me earlier in the week too. I’ve been a customer with them for over 20
years, and yet despite being an internet customer they still apparently feel
the need to ‘cold call’ me and want me to answer questions with personal
information before they speak any further to me. When I requested that they update their
records so that they don’t cold call me any more in the future, she told me she
was not allowed to, for security reasons, as it breached data protection! You have to laugh at the irony!
The chap said to me yesterday that he was unable to speak
any further about the purpose of his call due to me not providing the security
information, and when I asked him why was it necessary to speak to me on the
phone rather than via post, he said it was because they needed to record my
voice recognition. What?!
I know when I purchase shares, they record me replying ‘yes’
to the question “Do you want to proceed with the purchase Mr Ingram?”, and that
is accurately timed, and is evidentially very important, but for updating your
car insurance?
When I dug a bit deeper with this chap it transpired that in
order to comply with the Data Protection principle of ensuring they have
accurate data on their customers, they CHOOSE to ask these questions at the
beginning of the call as it is ‘easier’ for them. I’m sure it is easier for them, and when I
call them, I have no issue in doing it, but when I am cold called by them, and
then asked to provide security answers, it seems to me that they are in fact
breaching my own personal security and it is a practice that should be avoided
at all costs.
No comments:
Post a Comment